Category Archives: Uncategorized

Biden’s Rules For Radicals

Posted on by
Reply
Picture of Saul Alinsky
Haunting picture of Independence Hall during President Biden's divisive 1 September 2022 Speech

If you think President Biden’s 1 September “Red Speech” was radical, there’s a good reason. That’s because his speech follows the dictates of Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals. It’s also interesting to note that Alinsky perversely dedicated Rules For Radicals to Lucifer, who he dubbed the first radical.

Fittingly, the blood red backdrop of Biden’s speech in front of Independence Hall was reminiscent of the gates of hell. What Biden was trying to do was to apply one of Alinsky’s most well-known tactics. Specifically to pick a target, freeze it, personalize it, and then polarize it.

Since most of Joe Biden’s inner circle are leftovers from Barack Obama’s administration or Clintonistas, it’s no small wonder that Alinsky’s tactics are in play. Biden, or more accurately his radical democrat handlers, picked MAGA Republicans as the target. More directly, Ultra-MAGA Republicans. Alinsky probably never envisioned his tactics being tried on half of the country or certainly 74+ million Americans. But that is exactly what Biden and the Democrats are attempting.

For Biden to be successful he must “freeze” those 74+ million Americans. Freezing them, holding them in place, is a prerequisite to personalizing them and essential to polarizing them. What this means for Republicans is that they must stay on the move, go on offense, take the political flight straight to the Democrats and the radical president in the White House.

This requires offense at every level of the Republican Party from the grassroots to local, state, and federal republican organizations, from elected officials, to those running for office, and most certainly the identified leadership of the Republican Party.

Unfortunately, Mitch McConnell is one of those leaders, and it’s clear he has no ability to fight. McConnell’s nickname is the slow moving easy to freeze “turtle”. On the positive side, Republicans have many fine candidates running for office and fighters like former President Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis who are adept at political movement and counterpunching. Biden’s Red Speech must be used to turn the tables on the Democrats. It must be used to freeze them, to personalize them, and to polarize them.

The gloves must come off, and it’s time to turn Alinsky against the radicals.

How American Healing Begins: Tear Down the Racist Democrat Party

Posted on by
Reply

The Democrat Partys gone full throated Marxist. Destruction of a Nations history to weaken its people is in lock step with Hugo Chavez and other Marxist dictators and Marxist dogma. The Democrat Party, via violent surrogates such as the fascist ANTIFA, and BLM Inc., are engaged in unmooring Americans from our history, and heritage. In radical Democrat zest to destroy all that was, one massively racist organization gets ignored. Before ripping down one more statue, or renaming one more building, Republicans must unite to counter the Marxist movement, and begin healing the Nation.

Republicans must call for all #cancelculture to first cancel the Democrat Party, Americas historical caldron of racism. After all, if radical Democrats demand the tearing down of every founding father, even statues of Presidents Lincoln and US Grant, the Democrat Party must go first. Planned Parenthood, founded by racist/Eugenics Democrat Margaret Sanger should be next. Only after these two chronic vessels of racism are destroyed can any further discussions ensue.

Lets present a quick summary of the inescapable charges of racism against the Democrat Party.

  • Democrats owned slaves, in fact Democrats were slavery incarnate.
  • In the years after their Confederacy lost a civil war, to Republican President Abraham Lincoln (The Great Emancipator), Democrats established:
    • The KKK, in two distinct waves
    • Jim Crow Laws
    • Poll taxes
    • Literacy tests
    • Segregation
    • Separate but equal
    • Bull Conner, guard dogs and fire hoses
    • Planned Parenthood, the racist eugenics purveyor.
    • “Grand Kleagle” Sen Robert Byrd (D)

The full list is so long, it takes volumes to capture all of the Democrat Partys racist acts. Given the tenuous links to racism cited for so many Democrat #cancelculture cries, the Democrat Party stands alone, as The Mother of All Racist Institutions, and its cancel should be a no-brainer.

Americans need no lecture, or further radical violence from Democrats, who should immediately take a knee like Nancy Pelosi, apologize to America, and rip their party out by its racist historical roots!

Latest: Sen Bill Cassidy (R) – The Democrat Party Should Change It’s Name Due to It’s Racist Past!

The Seven Pillars of Socialism

Posted on by
Reply

The Democrat Party devolved over past decades from a predominantly pro-America party to a largely radical socialist party. Bernie Sanders, who twice nearly won the Democrat Party’s Presidential nomination, is their most well known socialist, but far from the only one. AOC leads the new cast of true believer Democrat socialists.

In light of the Democrat Party’s pro-socialist movement, it’s critical for all Americans to understand what socialism is and how to identify socialists and socialist policies.

“Socialism is Government Force to Control and Change Society.”

“Socialism progresses like a snake eating its tail.”

Socialism exists as a utopian dream, extolled on the virtues of an impossible society, snake oil sold by charismatic authoritarian charlatans.

  • “All-Powerful RULERS: A ruler is quick to conquer the world but slow to conquer himself…The ruler operates according to Ruler’s Law (like a king) and will neither bow to the people’s will nor obey any written law. It is government by the ruler’s fancy and whim.”
  • Venezuelan Socialist Dictator Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicholas Maduro.
  • Picture of Saul Alinsky
  • “Society Divided into CASTES or CLASSES: There are no rulers without slaves…Under socialism, society must be divided into classes…At the bottom are the most abused and least privileged of all: the workers, the peasants, the serfs, the slaves.”
Russian Peasants During Russian Revolution
Russian Peasants During Russian Revolution
  • “All Things in COMMON: Basic socialist doctrine teaches that the ownership of property is the cause of all discord and envy…Private ownership must eventually be eliminated altogether…In centuries past, this “commonality” has gone so far as having wives and children in common.”
  • “All Things REGULATED: Total control requires total regulation. By issuing a regular stream of new laws and requirements, the Rulers control all economic activities and production.”
  • “Compliance is FORCED: In socialism, all human activity is restrained or compelled to action with the use of force-penalties, fines, restrictions, “catch-22″ laws, prison and a multitude of fees and taxes.”
  • “Control of INFORMATION: Information is a powerful weapon for social control…A regime…perpetuates its hold on the culture by disseminating its messages through outlets it can control such as news sources, the media, entertainment outlets, textbooks and classroom discussions.”
  • “No Unalienable RIGHTS: It is important for socialism’s success to eliminate any ideas about natural rights, to jeer and ridicule them out of existence. Only government sanctioned rights may exist in a socialistic world.” NOTE: What the government can give, it can take away!”
Bill of Rights
United States Bill of Rights

Source: The Naked Socialist

Other:
5 Reasons Bernie’s Nordic Model Fails
Assessing Socialism’s Growing Threat to America
Fascism vs Progressivism

Nordic Leaders Slam Sanders – We Aren’t Socialists
– Swedish Ex-Prime Minister Rebukes Bernie: Socialism Only Destroys
– Danish PM in US: Denmark Is Not Socialist

https://www.fightsocialism.org/

The Democrat’s Inquisition

Posted on by
Reply
Clown Graphic of Shifty Schiff, Pelosi's Grand Inquisitor
Shifty Schiff - Pelosi's Grand Inquisitor

The Spanish Inquisition lasted for over 350 years, from 1478 to 1834. It involved Inquisitors trying the accused, and passing judgement over them (prosecutor, judge and jury). “Trials” involved secret witnesses testifying against the accused, who never knew those who testified against them. The accused rarely had supporting witnesses, because nobody wanted to cross the Inquisitors and find themselves in the inquisitorial crosshairs. The accused were rarely told what they were accused of, while confessions were extracted, often by torture.

Fast forward to 2019 where Congressman Adam Schiff lurks as the all powerful Grand Inquisitor of the Democrat House’s Coup Impeachment Inquisition! Like his Spanish Inquisition forebears Schiff acts in secret, determines who testifies, stops any witnesses that would disprove his manufactured charges, prevents President Trump’s lawyers from defending him, and stops Republicans from asking Schiff’s witnesses questions, interrupting Rep. Elaine Stefanik (R-NY) numerous times on Friday. The damage Schiff, Pelosi and House Democrats are heaping on an already Russia hoax damaged federal justice system is incalculable.

The American People deserve far better! Only time will tell if AG William Barr, IG Michael Horowitz and U.S. Attorney John Durham will hold accountable those deep state actors, like Inquisitor Schiff, who see themselves above the law!

Civil Rights Infographic 1963-2020

Posted on by
Reply
Infographic Exposing the Dark Racial Past of the Democrat Party, and the Civil Rights Leadership of the Republican Party.

“The sober truth is that the most important civil rights battles were fought and won four decades before the Obama presidency. The black underclass continues to face many challenges, but they have to do with values and habits, not oppression from a manifestly unjust society.“ Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed

14 January, 1963: Governor George Wallace (D) “Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.” delivered it from the portico of the Alabama State Capitol. This was the exact place where Jefferson Davis had been sworn in as the President of the Confederate States of America.

2 May, 1963: “Republicans condemn Democratic Sheriff of Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2000 black children who were marching for their civil rights.”

May 1963 Congress passes the Equal Pay Act of 1963: “In 1942, Republican congresswoman Winifred C. Stanley from Buffalo, N.Y. introduced H.R. 5056, Prohibiting Discrimination in Pay on Account of Sex, which did not pass at the time.” Wikipedia

1964: Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Act by Democratic US Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd who served in the Senate until his death in 2010. The Civil Rights Act was also opposed by most Southern Democratic Senators, several of whom were proud segregationists – one of them being Al Gore Sr. Democratic President Lyndon Johnson had to rely on Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen to get the act passed. 31.3% of Democrats voted against the act, 81.8% of Republicans Voted for it.


1965: Republicans in the House and Senate vote, in much higher % than Democrats, to successfully pass the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (Enforcing Voting Rights).

  • House: Republicans vote 112 Yea/24 Nay (82.4% FOR), Democrats vote 221 Yea/61 Nay (78.4% FOR)
  • Senate: Republicans vote 30 Yea/2 Nay (93.8% FOR), Democrats vote 47 Yea/16 Nay (74.6% FOR)

21 March, 1965: “Republican Federal Judge Frank Johnson authorizes Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s protest march, from Selma to Montgomery, overruling Democrat Governor George Wallace.”

1969: Republican President Richard Nixon instituted the first Affirmative Action program with the “Philadelphia Plan” that established goals and timetables.

1972: Republican President Richard Nixon signs into law the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972.

1976: Republican President Gerald Ford issues order rescinding Democrat FDR’s Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese Americans.

1981: Republican President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities to increase black participation in federal education programs. Executive Order 12320

2 November, 1983: Republican President Ronald Reagan signs a bill establishing a federal holiday honoring Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

1987: President Ronald Reagan calls for liberation of East Europeans from Communism with his powerful “Tear Down This Wall” speech.

January 1993: Bill Clinton sworn in as President of the United States. His mentor was know racist J. William Fulbright (D) AR, who voted against the CRA 1964, and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Al Gore, Jr. was his VP. Gore’s father was Dixiecrat Albert Gore Sr. (D) TN, who also voted against the CRA of 1964.

President Trump’s First Term (2017-2020): “President Trump can take credit for many achievements that have benefitted the black community.

  • The presidents tax cuts
  • Elimination of unnecessary government regulations, and other policies have driven black unemployment and the black poverty rate to record lows. These policies have sparked a renaissance in manufacturing and other jobs that has benefitted not just black Americans, but all Americans.
  • Many Opportunity Zones the president has created in low-income and predominantly black areas have revitalized areas neglected under Democratic administrations.
  • The president has also advocated for school choice that has given students in underperforming public schools the option of attending schools where they can get a better education. Many of the students benefitting from school choice are black.
  • President Trump has increased support for the nations historically black colleges and universities, which continue to play an important role in the education of young black men and women.
  • Trump signed the First Step Act into law in December 2018. The law allows non-violent convicts to get out of prison earlier and reenter society as productive members of their communities. Black people benefitted disproportionately from this long-overdue reform that reversed the get tough on crime policies of Democrats in years past, which led to mass incarceration.”

Sources:

  • www.presidency.ucsb.edu
  • Hillary’s America
  • Wrong on Race
  • The Big Lie
  • Wikipedia
  • America’s Indomitable Character, Volume IV
  • www.Govtrack.US
  • Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed

Additional History:

The Parties Didn’t Switch Sides!

Posted on by
Reply

The Claim:

Blacks switched from Supporting the Republican Party to Supporting the Democrat Party immediately after passage of the 1965 Civil Rights Act.

Why?

Because Immediately After Voting on the CRA of 1965, Civil Rights Republicans became Democrats, and historically racist Democrats became Republicans. Blacks responded, running from the racists.

The Facts

The black community did not switch to voting for democrats after 1965. They switched in the 1930s, 30 years earlier. The first Democrat presidential candidate to receive a majority of the black vote was FDR in 1936.

“From 1865 to 1936…approximately 90 percent of blacks voted Republican and only 10% voted Democratic.”

“By 1936, 75 percent of blacks became Democrats. This trend has only continued since then…” Hillary’s America

Debunking the claim that Immediately After 1965 Republicans became Democrats, and historically racist Democrats became Republicans.

Elected Officials:

The Facts Of Politicians Switching Parties Post 1965.

All total, 126 Congressmen voted NO, only 4 switched parties, 96.8% DID NOT.

  • 21 Democrat Senators Voted Against the CRA of 1964, Only 1 Switched Parties
  • 46 Democrat Senators Voted For the CRA of 1964, NONE Switched Parties
  • 6 Republican Senators Voted Against the CRA of 1964, NONE Switched Parties
  • 27 Republican Senators Voted For the CRA of 1964, NONE Switched Parties

NOTE: Republican Senators voted in favor of the CRA of 1964 in greater percentages than Democrats did (81.8% vs 68.7%). Republican Senators also broke the Democrat Party’s 75 Day filibuster of the CRA.

  • 94 Democrat Congressmen Voted Against the CRA of 1964, Only 4 Switched Parties
  • 35 Republican Congressmen Voted Against the CRA of 1964, NONE Switched Parties
  • 136 Republican Congressmen Voted For the CRA of 1964, Only 3 Switched Parties: Two became Democrats, One became an Independent. 98.8% Remained Republicans.
    • Far from leaving the party, some also became national leaders within the Republican Party (Donald Rumsfeld, Gerald Ford, Robert Dole).

A much more comprehensive list solidifies the fact that that parties did not switch. Dinesh D’Sousa, in his movie Hillary’s America, details a list of 1600 racist democrats including:

  • Leaders of the KKK
  • Leaders of other racist groups
  • Democrat Congressmen from 1860-2000
  • Democrat Senators from 1860-2000
  • Democrat Senators and Congressmen who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964

The total that switched parties to become Republicans…

only 14 out of 1600, less than 1%.

*Data From: Hillary’s America the Movie,Stolen History, Wikipedia, GovTrackUS

Debunking the claim that Immediately After 1965 Republicans became Democrats, and historically racist Democrats became Republicans.

Voting Patterns:

*Data From Stolen History, NCSL.Org

# of Party Wins in Presidential Elections Across the “Solid South”? (Totals of the 11 Former Confederate States) From 1964 to 2017

# of Party Wins in Gubernatorial Elections Across the 11 Former Confederate States From 1964 to 2017

“The Parties did not switch. They (Democrats) just switched tactics from Force to Isolation to Entitlements, to Marxism all of which steal True Equality and True Prosperity.”

Stolen History

Civil Rights Infographic (1921-1960)

Posted on by
2
Infographic Exposing the Dark Racial Past of the Democrat Party, and the Civil Rights Leadership of the Republican Party.

“Lynching had become so common in the United States, especially in the South, that in 1921 Representative L. C. Dyer of Missouri introduced a bill in the House of Representatives to make lynching a federal crime.

Dyer acted out of conscience but also at the strong behest of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. The bill passed the House, but Southerners in the Senate organized a filibuster that prevented a vote, resulting in the measure’s failure and leaving the states to deal with the lynching problem.”1

NOTE: NAACP website (quote above) discusses the anti-lynching bill, but fails to mention the party (Republican) that passed it, or the party (Democrat) that stopped it in the Senate. The truth about the parties is clear!

“Democratic Convention of 1924, known to history as the “Klanbake.”

The 103-ballot convention was held in Madison Square Garden. Hundreds of delegates were members of the Ku Klux Klan, the Klan so powerful (within the Democrat Party) that a plank condemning Klan violence was defeated outright.

To celebrate, the Klan staged a rally with 10,000-hooded Klansmen in a field in New Jersey directly across the Hudson from the site of the convention. Attended by hundreds of cheering convention delegates, the rally featured burning crosses and calls for violence against African-Americans & Catholics.”

2

Photo: The 1924 Democratic National Convention, held at the Madison Square Garden in New York City, infamously known as the “Klanbake”.

October 3, 1924 “Republicans denounce three-time Democrat presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan for defending the Ku Klux Klan at 1924 Democratic National Convention”3

Cover Page of 1923 Rosewood, Florida Violence Report, published 22 Dec 1993.

“The Rosewood Massacre was a violent, racially motivated massacre of blacks and destruction of a black town that took place during the first week of January 1923 in rural Levy County, Florida. At least six blacks and two whites were killed, and the town of Rosewood was abandoned and destroyed in what contemporary news reports characterized as a race riot.”

The Rosewood Massacre is almost certainly another example of racist democrats attacking blacks in the south. There is absolutely NO mention in the Rosewood Report of political parties. It is sadly typical of the historical whitewashing going on in America today. A lengthy search of the internet could not find the political parties of any of the known people involved, such as Sheriff Robert Alias Walker.

The Klan, the militant arm of the democrat party, was immensely powerful in Florida during this period, as it was throughout the southern states. The Klan’s revival ignited by President Woodrow Wilson. Reports show that many klan members were present during the massacre.

Given the Democrat Party’s “Klanbake” which occurred a year later, there is little doubt that the “white people” mentioned in the report were democrats, as they were during the Wilmington Race Riot.

Typical comments from the report, which show the lengths the authors went to avoid showing the party affiliations of those culpable, and to place the blame on “America” in general:

  • “The failure of elected white officials to take forceful actions to protect the safety and property of local black residents was part of a pattern in the state and throughout the region.
  • Local and state officials failed to intervene to protect black citizens, and in each incident several innocent blacks were killed and their property destroyed. The same was true in other southern states where rape and black resistance were not tolerated by white residents and were seen as a legitimate excuse to abandon the law in favor of brute force.
  • Pleas from citizens and their spokesmen fell on deaf ears, and Florida’s white leadership responded to the civil and racial unrest only when it threatened to jeopardize the state’s economic advancement.
  • Like the racial violence innumerous other communities throughout Florida and the South during this era, Rosewood was a tragedy of American democracy and the American legal system.”

1928: First Hispanic U.S. Senator, Senator Octaviano Larrazolo (R-NM), sworn in.

June 12, 1929: “First Lady Lou Hoover (R) invites wife of U.S. Rep. Oscar De Priest (R-IL), an African-American, to tea at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country”4

1933 – Up to this year, every single black member of the US Congress was Republican.

Note the massive swing in House Control from Republican to Democrat in the chart below, which remained largely in Democrat Party control until 1995. The Senate follows the same pattern.

US House Party Majorities - Note The Impacts From The Great Depression (1931-1941), and The New Deal

US House Party Majorities – Note The Democrat Majorities Stemming From The Great Depression (1931-1941), and The New Deal

1930s – Two major events occurred that change the allegiance of most blacks in America from Republican to Democrat (the Great Depression, and the New Deal, which served as the newest Democrat enslavement program). By the end of the 1930, the vast majority had switched parties.

  • This occurred long before the “Dixicrats” rose up, and returned to the Democrat Party, or the Democrat party’s 1965 Civil Rights Act filibuster.

1937 – FDR (Democrat) rams through Senator Hugo Black’s (D) Alabama SCOTUS nomination in only a few days before any vetting could occur.

  • Story of Justice Black’s KKK history broke soon after his confirmation. The Democrat Party “circled the wagons around him” attacking those who exposed Black’s racist history. Wrong on Race

1940 “Republican Party Platform calls for integration of the armed forces; however, Democrat President Franklin Delano Roosevelt refused to order it.”5

14 January, 1942 – Democrat “President Franklin D. Roosevelt issues Presidential Proclamation No. 2537, requiring aliens from World War II-enemy countriesItaly, Germany and Japan to register with the United States Department of Justice. Registered persons were then issued a Certificate of Identification for Aliens of Enemy Nationality. A follow-up to the Alien Registration Act of 1940, Proclamation No. 2537 facilitated the beginning of full-scale internment of Japanese Americans the following month.”

“October 20, 1942 – “60 prominent African-Americans issue the Durham Manifesto, calling on southern Democrats to abolish their all-white primaries.”6

April 3, 1944 – U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Texas Democratic Party’s whites only primary election system

18 February, 1946 – “Appointed by Republican President Calvin Coolidge, federal judge Paul McCormick ends segregation of Mexican-American children in California public schools.”6

1948 – “Dixiecrats” rise from the Democrat Party, and returned back to it after the Presidential Election of 1948.

1948: Party Platforms

  • Republican: We are opposed to the idea of racial segregation in the armed services of the United States. We favor the abolition of the poll tax as a requisite to voting. Lynching or any other form of mob violence anywhere is a disgrace to any civilized state, and we favor the prompt enactment of legislation to end this infamy.
  • Democratic Party: Silent on all three.

1949 – Margaret Chase Smith (R-ME) becomes the first woman to serve in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s (R) Administration (1953-1961)

See Infographic Above For Additional Civil Rights Actions:

1953 – California’s 3-term Republican Governor Earl Warren, who was also the 1948 Republican Vice-Presidential Nominee and later the Chief Supreme Court Justice, wrote the landmark decision in Brown V. Board of Education banning segregation in public schools. Justice Warren was appointed by President Eisenhower (R).

1956 – “Until 1956 when he (Martin Luther King Jr.) registered as a Republican, every Civil Rights law hand been introduced and passed by Republicans in opposition by the Democrats.”7

1956 – Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in decision striking down Alabama’s segregation law that forced blacks to sit in the back of buses. Civil Rights leaders Martin Luther King, JR. and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President.7

NOTE: President Eisenhower had already banned such segregation on interstate busses!

March 12, 1956 – Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation

1959 First Asian-American U.S. Senator, Hiram Fong (R-HI), is seated

Annotated Sources:

  1. NAACP Website
  2. www.Armered-Column.com
  3. Sandiego Union Tribune.com
  4. Hillary’s America
  5. www.Presidency UCSB.edu
  6. America’s Indomitable Character, Vol IV
  7. Stolen History

Additional Sources:

Civil Rights Infographic (1890-1921)

Posted on by
2
Infographic Exposing Dark Racial Past of the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party's Struggle to Bring Equal Rights to All Americans (1863-1880s)

Infographic Exposing Dark Racial Past of the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party’s Struggle to Bring Equal Rights to All Americans (1890-1921)

30 August, 1890 – “The Republican President Benjamin Harrison signs legislation by U.S. Senator Justin Morrill (R-VT) making African-Americans eligible for lan-grant colleges in the South.” America’s Indomitable Character

Feb 8, 1894 – “The Democrat Congress and Democrat President Grover-Cleveland join to repeal the Republican’s Enforcement Act, which had enables African-Americans to vote.” America’s Indomitable Character, Vol IV

Picture of the Destruction of Manly Printing Press, November 10, 1898.

1) The Wilmington “Race Riot” of 1898 – A Democrat Party mob attacked an African American owned newspaper, burning it to the ground and killing at least 14 and possibly up to 60. Many high profile black leaders fled the city, along with many whites, over 2,100 in all. No repercussions came to the democrats responsible.

1898 Wilmington Race Riot Commission Final Report 31 May, 2006

Democrat Party in North Carolina perpetrated “the only confirmed coup d’etat in American history, when Democrats forced the lawfully elected Republican leaders of Wilmington, North Carolina, (Republican mayor, Board of Aldermen, and Chief of Police) out of office at gun-point.” This was an attack on the US Constitution. Wrong on Race

“This report should show that the riot was not an isolated, spontaneous, incident but the result of a series of events that were directed and planned by upper class white businessmen in order to regain control of government and that Wilmington should not be viewed as existing in a vacuum. It was part of a larger campaign to take over state government in 1898. Democratic Party strategists thrust the city into the spotlight as an example of Republican corruption and bad government because of the participation of African Americans in local politics.

Organizers of the coup instituted a banishment campaign, targeting political opponents, black and white, leading to the expulsion from the city of over twenty targeted individuals and a mass exodus of over 2,100 others. Consequently, the Republican power base in Wilmington was destroyed.”

NOTE: The Democrats took control of the NC General Assembly in 1899 and Governor in 1901. Largely due to disenfranchising black voters, the Democrat Party dominated NC politics for the next 70 years.

Oct 16, 1901 – “President Theodore Roosevelt (R) invites Booker T. Washington to dine at the White House, sparking protests by Democrats across the country.” America’s Indomitable Character, Vol IV.

Virginia Constitution:

Jun 12, 1901 – June 26, 1902 – “An elected body of 100 delegates, including 11 Republicans and 1 independent, convenes in Richmond for a constitutional convention, and debates for almost a year.

July 10, 1902 – Virginia’s Constitution of 1902 becomes law, disfranchising thousands of poor whites and nearly eliminating the state’s African-American electorate. It replaces Virginia’s 1869 Reconstruction-era constitution, which had a universal male suffrage clause. The 1902 Constitution created a new legal enforcement of Jim Crow and further solidified its social enforcement.

November 7, 1905 – Largely because of the voting restrictions implemented by the Constitution of 1902, 88,000 fewer ballots are cast in the gubernatorial election than in the previous election in 1901.

July, 1971 – The Constitution of 1971 becomes law and ends the rules and regulations instituted by the Constitution of 1902.”

Is this racist history behind Democrat Party hysteria that voter ID laws would cause blacks to lose the right to vote? Is this a justified case of Democrat Party “White Guilt”?

Democrat Woodrow Wilson’s Administration (March 4, 1913 March 4, 1921):

2) 1913 Headline Washington Post Headline from 1913: “Wants to Part Races: Thompson Introduces Rigid Segregation Bill in House”, Thompson was a Democrat Congressman from Oklahoma, who stoked the Federal Government Segregation policy of Democrat President Woodrow Wilson.

By the close of 1913 “segregation had been realized in the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the Post Office Department, the Office of the Auditor for the Post Office, and had even begun in the City Post Office in Washington D.C. Wrong on Race

For the first time “In 1914 the Civil Service began demanding photographs to accompany employment applications to weed out black applicants.” Wrong on Race

Black political appointees in the South were fired, as were many working in local post offices and as collectors of internal revenue. Wrong on Race

March 17, 1913 August 26, 1920: FDR served in the Wilson Administration as the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, under overt racist Josephus Daniels, who instituted segregation throughout the USN. No record that JFK ever spoke out/opposed segregation in the federal government, or in the USN! WWI kept blacks in segregated units. Hillary’s America/Wrong On Race

3) Republicans like CM John Rogers (R) Massachusetts tried to fight segregation, but they were in the Congressional minority, and ignored. Democrats held a 157 member advantage in the house and a 7 vote advantage in the Senate. Washington Post (Oct 17, 1913)

WWI, under President Wilson (D), the US Military created segregated units, and kept blacks out of combat. Wrong on Race

Movie Bill for Racist Klan Movie "The Birth Of A Nation".

Movie Bill for Racist Klan Movie “The Birth Of A Nation”.

1915 President Wilson (D) held a private White House showing of the “notoriously racist movie” The Birth of a Nation for himself, senior members of Congress and the Supreme Court. Wrong on Race/Hillary’s America. Democrat Presidential imprimatur gave rise to a new explosion of Ku Klux Klan terrorism.

1917 Rep. Jeannette Rankin (R-MT), sworn in as the first woman in Congress.

 

 

 

 

4) “The Nineteenth Amendment was first introduced in Congress in 1878 by Senator Aaron D. Sargent (R). The bill calling for the amendment would be introduced unsuccessfully each year for the next forty years. Forty-one years later, in 1919, Congress approved the amendment and submitted it to the states for ratification.” Wikipedia

“At the request of Susan B. Anthony, Sen. A.A. Sargent, a Republican from California, introduced the 19th Amendment in 1878. Sargent’s amendment (also known as the Susan B. Anthony Amendment) was defeated four times by a Democrat-controlled Senate. When the Republican Party regained control of Congress in 1919, the Equal Suffrage Amendment finally passed the House in May of that year and in the Senate in June.” National Federation of Republican Women

Democrats used filibusters on multiple occasions to stop the bill in their “War on Women” until Republicans were ultimately successful in 1919.

House Vote: 85% of Republicans Yes; and only 54% of Democrats Yes

Senate Vote: 56 to 25 (Republicans 36 Yes, 8 No); (Democrats 20 Yes, 17 No)

When the Amendment was submitted to the states, 26 of the 36 states that ratified it had Republican legislatures. Of the nine states that voted against ratification, eight were Democratic. American Spectator

“Twelve states, all Republican, had given women full suffrage before the federal amendment was ratified.”

5) 26 January, 1920 – “Minnesota’s FIRST-in-the-nation anti-lynching law, promoted by African-American Republican Nellie Francis, signed by Republican Gov. Jacob Preus.” America’s Indomitable Character

6) This period saw the rise to prominence of Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, and advocate for abortions and population control through “Eugenics”.

NOTE: Hillary Clinton received the Margaret Sanger Award in 2009, maintaining a solid connection to the Democrat Party’s racist past. Sanger Quotes:

“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

“We want a world freer, happier, cleaner we want a race of thoroughbreds.”

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members”

  • Historian Kenneth O’Reilly, Nixon’s Piano: Presidents and Racial Politics from Washington to Clinton.

Franklin D. Roosevelt (D):

March 17, 1913 – August 26, 1920: FDR (D) served in the Wilson Administration as the Assistant Secretary of the Navy, under overt racist Josephus Daniels, who instituted segregation throughout the USN. No record that JFK ever spoke out/opposed segregation in the federal government, or in the USN! In WWI blacks were also kept in segregated units. Hillary’s America/Wrong On Race

1921 FDR Founds Polio Treatment Facility, for Whites Only. Wrong on Race, Naomi Rogers, “Race and the Politics of Polio”.

Stolen History: Revealing The Truth To Unite America

“The Democrats brought about the Civil War which killed over 640,000 American Citizens for the cause of Democrats Ruling Over Men.

The Democrats put upon us segregation and split the United States population for the cause of Democrats Ruling Over Men.

Democrats are now forcing Socialism upon us for the cause of Democrats Ruling of Men.”

Useful Links:

The Real Reason Trump Was Investigated for Russian Ties

Posted on by
Reply

Hillary Clinton Delivering Campaign Speech

My hypothesis as to why President Trump was investigated for Russian ties is at least as plausible, and likely far more plausible, than the Democrat Party’s Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy. The Democrat Party is on a crusade to destroy Donald Trump’s Presidency. So far, an 8+ month investigation has returned exactly zero evidence that Donald Trump and his campaign colluded with the Russian government to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Note: There are no claims that the grossly embarrassing information exposed by the DNC server hack and John Podesta’s emails was faked.

The Democrat Party is well known for the tactic of going on the Offensive by charging opponents with accusations that they themselves are guilty of. They are quick to tar and feather the Republican Party and every member in it as racist supporters of the Ku Klux Klan working to bring back Jim Crow Laws for example. Of course the truth is that the Klan was the militant arm of the Democrat Party, and it was Democrats who invented and employed Jim Crow Laws. History shows that Republicans were the Party that fought the Klan and Jim Crow Laws.

It’s also well known that in campaigns the truth doesn’t always matter. October surprises often have some measure of truth, but their real intent is to quickly damage one’s opponent in the run up to Election Day. The election ends before the full truth gets out.

It’s with these two thoughts as background that I hypothesize that the investigation into Donald Trump and his campaign’s alleged ties to Russia was in fact:

  1. A weaponization of the United States intelligence agencies and
  2. Their use in opposition research for Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Why? Remember, the book Clinton Cash clearly detailed Hillary and Bill Clinton’s ties to the Russian Government and Vladimir Putin. Bill Clinton was given over $700,000 for a speech that he gave in Russia. There were very clear ties between Hillary and Bill to wealthy Russian oligarchs.

Infographic Highlighting Corruption From Clinton Cash

Select Examples From “Clinton Cash” Exposing Hillary and Bill Clinton’s Scheme to Enrich Themselves And Their Foundation

Clinton Cash details the connections between the Clintons and Russian front companies in the sale of 20% of US uranium mines to the Russians. Clinton Cash also details how nine investors connected with the sale donated $145 Million to the Clinton foundation.

Hillary Clinton had no defense against these revelations. They were well documented and damning. Her campaign had to be concerned about her connections to Russia and Putin and her role as SECSTATE in moving the sale forward, so they needed a strategy to deal with it. Beyond ignoring the scandal, it’s likely that Hillary’s best strategy for blunting the impact of this bombshell was to have counter charges ready to go against Donald Trump.

Going on the Offensive against Trump’s campaign might buy Hillary enough time to get her safely through the election. In order to orchestrate an attack against Trump, Hillary’s political machine required a portfolio of evidence stockpiled and disseminated within Democratic operatives to be used at the moment of greatest need.

Unfortunately, the Russian connections to Clinton never became a significant issue during the election, despite its explosive nature. Clearly the Democrat Party and the minion media were completely convinced that Hillary Clinton was going to win the election, and so her blitzkrieg counterattack against Donald Trump and his campaign was never used.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democrat Party were shocked the night of 8 November, and Trump’s win demanded an explanation. The Democrat rank and file was enraged, since the minion media convinced them Hillary was going to win in a landslide. From their perspective it wasn’t possible that Trump could’ve beaten her fair and square.

The Democrat Party/Minion Media conspiracy that came out was the unspent Opposition Research round that Donald Trump’s campaign had ties to the Russians. In the end this witch-hunt will find nothing because there was nothing to it, and there never was intended to be anything of substance in it. The intent was merely to distract the American voter long enough to get Hillary across the finish line.

Further evidence as to my contention that ties to Russians and their impact on America’s elections really have nothing to do with this story is the clear evidence that no one is asking about Hillary Clinton’s ties to the Russians and what influence or leverage they may have had over her, had she become President. The fact that this is a one-way story, completely surrounding Donald Trump and his campaign, proves that facts really didn’t matter.

Updates:

  • John Solomon, Laura Ingraham Show on Fox News, 14 July, 2020

Why did the Democrats pick Russia and Ukraine to be the two pho-scandals that they pursued against President Trump and after hundreds of hours of reporting and going through documents, heres what we found out. They were trying to ward off, to scare away Republicans from using Russia as an issue against them in the 2016 election. Why? Because it was their biggest, one of their biggest foreign policy failures.

For greater details proving my April, 2017 hypothesis see John Solomon, and Seamus Bruner’s book: Fallout, Nuclear Bribes, Russian Spies, And The Washington Lies That Enriched The Clinton And Biden Dynasties.

  • Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA), Sean Hannity Show on Fox News, 29 July, 2020

I think what really happened was this was meant to be an October Surprise. They were trying to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Likely to cover up for Hillarys problems with Russia. Thats the irony here. And then they were desperate after the election to do something. And thats when the Obama Administration really got involved, and thats when it really started to come out that the FBI was just using whatever they had to just continue this investigation, and thats going to be the problem because they had nothing! It was all fantasies of the Democrats.

“The president’s legal team said Saturday they believe the entire meeting may have been part of a larger election-year opposition effort aimed at creating the appearance of improper connections between Trump family members and Russia that also included a now-discredited intelligence dossier produced by a former British intelligence agent named Christopher Steele who worked for a U.S. political firm known as Fusion GPS.”

Civil Rights Infographic (1863-1880s)

Posted on by
3

The First Civil Rights Era!

Infographic Exposing Dark Racial Past of the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party's Struggle to Bring Equal Rights to All Americans (1863-1880s)

Infographic Exposing Dark Racial Past of the Democratic Party, and the Republican Party’s Struggle to Bring Equal Rights to All Americans (1863-1880s)

The true history of Civil Rights in America is being buried: As evidence, note the US House of Representatives own History link to “Civil Rights”. It ignores the first Civil Rights Era and the first 110 years of history jumping straight to 1964. Americans need to understand our complete history of civil rights, the Democratic Party’s dark role, and the Republican Party’s civil rights fight begun at its birth in 1854.

US House History Page, incorrectly begins Civil Rights in 1964, ignoring the first 110 years.

US House History Page, incorrectly begins Civil Rights in 1964, ignoring the first 110 years. http://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/Civil-Rights/Civil-Rights/

 

Further evidence of how the Democrat Party’s Racist History has been buried. The following quote is from anAP US History Website, which posts definitions of APUSH terms. For the KKK, the site teaches:

“Deeply embittered, some Southern whites resorted to savage measures against “radical” rule. Many whites resented the success and ability of black legislators as much as they resented alleged “corruption.” A number of secret organizations mushroomed forth, the most notorious of which was the “Invisible Empire of the South,” or the ____, founded in Tennessee in 1866. They would approach the cabin of an “upstart” black and hammer on the door. In ghoulish tones one thirsty horseman would demand a bucket of water. Then, under pretense of drinking, he would pour it into a rubber attachment concealed beneath his mask and gown, smack his lips, and declare that this was the first water he had tasted since he was killed at the Battle of Shiloh. If fright did not produce the desired effect, force was employed.”

Where is the truth of who these “Southern Whites” were? They were the militant arm of the Democrat Party!

The strongest example of the Democrat Party’s historical whitewash is shown in the 2010 screenshot from their Party’s website. The site has since been rewritten.

2010 Screenshot from Democrat Party's Website, lying about their racist history.

Screenshot of Democrat Party Website circa 2010, clearly showing the Democrat Party’s effort to hide their racist history.

According to Dinesh D’Souza’s Hillary’s America:

+Democrat Party’s Heritage:

  • Oppression of Blacks/American Indians
    • Stole land from Indians and labor from Blacks
  • Since 1930s (Progressive Era), established modern plantations in the inner cities, added immigrants to the mix
  • Developed confiscatory/progressive taxation system, now taking something from everybody. Don’t forget the democrat driven tax rates of 80-90%. End state, take everything from everyone, distribute as they see fit.
  • From slavery through modern progressivism, Democrats have always stolen the fruits of peoples labor. Now, working to enslave Americans to the all powerful progressive state.
  • Party of deceit, lawlessness.
  • Modern Democrats contort our Nations Birth and our Constitution to denigrate America’s founding, and cover the racist history/nature of their party.

+Republican Party’s Heritage:

  • From its birth in 1854 was the Party of anti-slavery (which ended slavery), and inherited the ideals of the American Revolution (the revolutionary tradition)
    • Conserving the promises of liberty, freedom (political/economic/thought and religion), personal responsibility, justice (justice of rights (equality under the law), economic allocation i.e. free market capitalism).
  • Republicans always stood for letting people keep what they produce and earn.
  • Republicans have always been the party of women’s rights and minority rights.

+Hillary’s America

*Dred Scott: Dred Scott v Sanford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) is universally considered the worst decision in the history of the Supreme Court’s. In 1857, a Democratic Party dominated Supreme Court (7 Democrats vs 2 Republicans) handed down the infamous Dred Scott decision (7 to 2, all Democrats in the Majority), declaring that blacks were not persons or citizens but instead were property and therefore had no rights. Both Republican Justices (Justice John McLean and Justice Benjamin Curtis) opposed the majority and voted in favor of Dred Scott, an enslaved man, and his “God-given rights”.

1 13th Amendment Vote Counts:

  • House: Republicans (86 Yea, 0 Nay); Democrats (50 Nay, 14 Yea, 8 Not Voting);
  • Senate: Republicans (31 Yea, 0 Nay); Democrats (5 Nay, 2 Yea, 3 Not Voting)

NOTE: In 1865 President Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by confederate sympathizer John Wilkes Booth. President Lincoln’s Vice President and successor was Democrat Andrew Johnson.

15th Amendment Vote Counts:

  • House: Republicans (144Yea, 4 Nay, 27 Not Voting); Democrats (39 Nay, 0 Yea, 8 Not Voting);
  • Senate: Republicans (31 Yea, 0 Nay, 13 Not Voting); Democrats (8 Nay, 0 Yea, 1 Not Voting)

2 Black Codes: Furious over Republican passage of the constitutional amendments and civil rights legislation, southern democrats passed the infamous “Black Codes” (1865-1866).

Examples of Black Codes common throughout the south:

  • Restricted professions blacks could work in, allowed white masters to whip black servants
  • Restricted rights to own property, buy or lease land, and to conduct business
  • Restricted where blacks could travel, could be imprisoned if caught
  • Blacks restricted from juries, nor could they vote
  • Many crimes carried the death penalty for blacks, but not for whites
  • Testimony in court not admissible except against other blacks
  • Had to carry proof that they were working (labor contract or government license) or face arrest
  • Blacks could not leave their employers
  • Blacks could not possess knives, firearms or liquor

3 Civil Rights Act of 1866:

“An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their Vindication.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,That all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall have the same right, in every State and Territory in the United States, to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, and give evidence, to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal property, and to full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property, as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, and penalties, and to none other, any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, to the contrary notwithstanding.”

Contains 9 more sections.

*New Orleans Riot/Massacre: 30 July,1866 – In Democrat controlled City of New Orleans KKK, supported by police and firemen storm and attack the racially-integrated Republican convention in New Orleans. “Federal troops were called in to stop the violence but by the time they arrived the mayhem had run its course. Official reports from the massacre, one of the bloodiest riots of the Reconstruction era in the United States, listed 37 persons (34 black and 3 white Radicals a term for anti-slavery republicans) killed and 146 wounded. Contemporary witnesses believed the numbers to be much higher.” World Library, Louisiana State Museum, Free Republic

“The Committee of Congress appointed to investigate the riot in New Orleans on July 30, 1866, have lately presented a report, giving a full history of the tragedy. It is shown by that record that the riotous attack upon the Republican Convention, with its terrible results of massacre and murder, was planned and executed by the Mayor of New Orleans, and that it had the countenance of President Johnson, without which it would never have taken place.” Harper’s Weekly

Assassination: 1868 – Republican U.S. Representative James Hinds (R-AR), a strong supporter of reconstruction, was assassinate by the KKK, and state Representative Joseph Brook was seriously wounded. The assassin was George A. Clark (D), Secretary of the Democratic Committee of Monroe County, AR who shot Hinds in the back with a shotgun.” Clark was never arrested or prosecuted. Congressman Hinds was the highest ranking government official to be killed during reconstruction.

*Freedman’s Bureau: 1865-1872, a US Federal Agency within the War Department established by President Lincoln, supported by Republicans in Congress to Force Southern States to Comply with newly enacted freedoms for blacks during the Reconstruction era.

Justice Department: 1870, Established by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant to fight the Democrat Party’s KKK.

1st Black Senator: 1870, The Reverend Hiram Revels from Mississippi becomes the first person of color elected to the Senate, and he was a Republican.

2nd Black Senator: 1875, Blanche K. Bruce from Mississippi becomes the second person of color elected to the Senate, and he was a Republican.

NOTE: No other person of color was elected to the senate until 1967, when Edward Brooks, another Republican, was elected from Massachusetts.

Sources: Hillary’s America, Wrong on Race, Wikipedia, World Library Online, Louisiana State Museum, Free Republic, Online Library of Liberty, Stolen History

Useful Links/Sources: