The Real Reason Trump Was Investigated for Russia Validated

Hillary Clinton Delivering Campaign Speech

My hypothesis, originally posted in April 2017, as to why President Trump was investigated for Russian ties is at least as plausible, and likely far more plausible, than the Democrat Party’s Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy. The Democrat Party is on a crusade to destroy Donald Trump’s Presidency. So far, an 8+ month investigation has returned exactly zero evidence that Donald Trump and his campaign colluded with the Russian government to defeat Hillary Clinton.

Note: There are no claims that the grossly embarrassing information exposed by the DNC server hack and John Podesta’s emails was faked.

The Democrat Party is well known for the tactic of going on the Offensive by charging opponents with accusations that they themselves are guilty of. They are quick to tar and feather the Republican Party and every member in it as racist supporters of the Ku Klux Klan working to bring back Jim Crow Laws for example. Of course the truth is that the Klan was the militant arm of the Democrat Party, and it was Democrats who invented and employed Jim Crow Laws. History shows that Republicans were the Party that fought the Klan and Jim Crow Laws.

It’s also well known that in campaigns the truth doesn’t always matter. “October Surprises” often have some measure of truth, but their real intent is to quickly damage one’s opponent in the run up to Election Day. The election ends before the full truth gets out.

It’s with these two thoughts as background that I hypothesize that the investigation into Donald Trump and his campaign’s alleged ties to Russia was in fact:

  1. A weaponization of the United States intelligence agencies and
  2. Their use in opposition research for Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Why? Remember, the book Clinton Cash clearly detailed Hillary and Bill Clinton’s ties to the Russian Government and Vladimir Putin. Bill Clinton was given over $700,000 for a speech that he gave in Russia. There were very clear ties between Hillary and Bill to wealthy Russian oligarchs.

Infographic Highlighting Corruption From Clinton Cash

Select Examples From “Clinton Cash” Exposing Hillary and Bill Clinton’s Scheme to Enrich Themselves And Their Foundation

Clinton Cash details the connections between the Clintons and Russian front companies in the sale of 20% of US uranium mines to the Russians. Clinton Cash also details how nine investors connected with the sale donated $145 Million to the Clinton foundation.

Update: Thanks to Maria Bartiromo’s 23 August, 2020 show on Fox Business, Sen Lindsey Graham dropped a bombshell regarding Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential Campaign. According to Graham, the FBI found a foreign country funneling money into Hillary’s Presidential Campaign. A violation of federal law. The FBI was prepared to issue a FISA Warrant, but decided to give Clinton’s Campaign a defensive intelligence briefing instead, which the FBI did not do later for then Candidate Trump. We now see another dark reason Hillary had to invent a Russia Collusion “October Surprise”.

Hillary Clinton had no defense against these revelations. They were well documented and damning. Her campaign had to be concerned about her connections to Russia and Putin and her role as SECSTATE in moving the sale forward, so they needed a strategy to deal with it. Beyond ignoring the scandal, it’s likely that Hillary’s best strategy for blunting the impact of this bombshell was to have counter charges ready to go against Donald Trump.

Going on the Offensive against Trump’s campaign might buy Hillary enough time to get her safely through the election. In order to orchestrate an attack against Trump, Hillary’s political machine required a portfolio of evidence stockpiled and disseminated within Democratic operatives to be used at the moment of greatest need.

Unfortunately, the Russian connections to Clinton never became a significant issue during the election, despite its explosive nature. Clearly the Democrat Party and the minion media were completely convinced that Hillary Clinton was going to win the election, and so her blitzkrieg counterattack against Donald Trump and his campaign was never used.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democrat Party were shocked the night of 8 November, and Trump’s win demanded an explanation. The Democrat rank and file was enraged, since the minion media convinced them Hillary was going to win in a landslide. From their perspective it wasn’t possible that Trump could’ve beaten her fair and square.

The Democrat Party/Minion Media conspiracy that came out was the unspent Opposition Research round that Donald Trump’s campaign had ties to the Russians. In the end this witch-hunt will find nothing because there was nothing to it, and there never was intended to be anything of substance in it. The intent was merely to distract the American voter long enough to get Hillary across the finish line.

Further evidence as to my contention that ties to Russians and their impact on America’s elections really have nothing to do with this story is the clear evidence that no one is asking about Hillary Clinton’s ties to the Russians and what influence or leverage they may have had over her, had she become President. The fact that this is a one-way story, completely surrounding Donald Trump and his campaign, proves that facts really didn’t matter.

Validation:

  • John Solomon, Laura Ingraham Show on Fox News, 14 July, 2020

Why did the Democrats pick Russia and Ukraine to be the two pho-scandals that they pursued against President Trump and after hundreds of hours of reporting and going through documents, heres what we found out. They were trying to ward off, to scare away Republicans from using Russia as an issue against them in the 2016 election. Why? Because it was their biggest, one of their biggest foreign policy failures.

For greater details proving my April, 2017 hypothesis see John Solomon, and Seamus Bruner’s book: Fallout, Nuclear Bribes, Russian Spies, And The Washington Lies That Enriched The Clinton And Biden Dynasties.

  • Congressman Devin Nunes (R-CA), Sean Hannity Show on Fox News, 29 July, 2020

I think what really happened was this was meant to be an October Surprise. They were trying to tie Donald Trump to Russia. Likely to cover up for Hillarys problems with Russia. Thats the irony here. And then they were desperate after the election to do something. And thats when the Obama Administration really got involved, and thats when it really started to come out that the FBI was just using whatever they had to just continue this investigation, and thats going to be the problem because they had nothing! It was all fantasies of the Democrats.

“The president’s legal team said Saturday they believe the entire meeting may have been part of a larger election-year opposition effort aimed at creating the appearance of improper connections between Trump family members and Russia that also included a now-discredited intelligence dossier produced by a former British intelligence agent named Christopher Steele who worked for a U.S. political firm known as Fusion GPS.”

No, The Parties Didn’t Switch Sides!

The Claim:

Blacks switched from Supporting the Republican Party to Supporting the Democrat Party immediately after passage of the 1965 Civil Rights Act.

Why?

Because Immediately After Voting on the CRA of 1965, Civil Rights Republicans became Democrats, and historically racist Democrats became Republicans. Blacks responded, running from the racists.

The Facts

The black community did not switch to voting for democrats after 1965. They switched in the 1930s, 30 years earlier. The first Democrat presidential candidate to receive a majority of the black vote was FDR in 1936.

“From 1865 to 1936…approximately 90 percent of blacks voted Republican and only 10% voted Democratic.”

“By 1936, 75 percent of blacks became Democrats. This trend has only continued since then…” Hillary’s America

All total, 126 Congressmen voted NO, only 4 switched parties, 96.8% DID NOT.

  • 21 Democrat Senators Voted Against the CRA of 1964, Only 1 Switched Parties
  • 46 Democrat Senators Voted For the CRA of 1964, NONE Switched Parties
  • 6 Republican Senators Voted Against the CRA of 1964, NONE Switched Parties
  • 27 Republican Senators Voted For the CRA of 1964, NONE Switched Parties

NOTE: Republican Senators voted in favor of the CRA of 1964 in greater percentages than Democrats did (81.8% vs 68.7%). Republican Senators also broke the Democrat Party’s 75 Day filibuster of the CRA.

  • 94 Democrat Congressmen Voted Against the CRA of 1964, Only 4 Switched Parties
  • 35 Republican Congressmen Voted Against the CRA of 1964, NONE Switched Parties
  • 136 Republican Congressmen Voted For the CRA of 1964, Only 3 Switched Parties: Two became Democrats, One became an Independent. 98.8% Remained Republicans.
    • Far from leaving the party, some also became national leaders within the Republican Party (Donald Rumsfeld, Gerald Ford, Robert Dole).

A much more comprehensive list solidifies the fact that that parties did not switch. Dinesh D’Sousa, in his movie Hillary’s America, details a list of 1600 racist democrats including:

  • Leaders of the KKK
  • Leaders of other racist groups
  • Democrat Congressmen from 1860-2000
  • Democrat Senators from 1860-2000
  • Democrat Senators and Congressmen who voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964

The total that switched parties to become Republicans…

only 14 out of 1600, less than 1%.

*Data From: Hillary’s America the Movie,Stolen History, Wikipedia, GovTrackUS

Debunking the claim that Immediately After 1965 Republicans became Democrats, and historically racist Democrats became Republicans.

Voting Patterns:

*Data From Stolen History, NCSL.Org

# of Party Wins in Presidential Elections Across the “Solid South”? (Totals of the 11 Former Confederate States) From 1964 On

# of Party Wins in Presidential Elections Across the “Solid South”? (Totals of the 11 Former Confederate States) From 1964 On

# of Party Wins in Gubernatorial Elections Across the 11 Former Confederate States From 1964 On

“The Parties did not switch. They (Democrats) just switched tactics from Force to Isolation to Entitlements, all of which steal True Equality and True Prosperity.”

Stolen History

How American Healing Begins: Tear Down the Racist Democrat Party

The Democrat Partys gone full throated Marxist. Destruction of a Nations history to weaken its people is in lock step with Hugo Chavez and other Marxist dictators and Marxist dogma. The Democrat Party, via violent surrogates such as the fascist ANTIFA, and BLM Inc., are engaged in unmooring Americans from our history, and heritage. In radical Democrat zest to destroy all that was, one massively racist organization gets ignored. Before ripping down one more statue, or renaming one more building, Republicans must unite to counter the Marxist movement, and begin healing the Nation.

Republicans must call for all #cancelculture to first cancel the Democrat Party, Americas historical caldron of racism. After all, if radical Democrats demand the tearing down of every founding father, even statues of Presidents Lincoln and US Grant, the Democrat Party must go first. Planned Parenthood, founded by racist/Eugenics Democrat Margaret Sanger should be next. Only after these two chronic vessels of racism are destroyed can any further discussions ensue.

Lets present a quick summary of the inescapable charges of racism against the Democrat Party.

  • Democrats owned slaves, in fact Democrats were slavery incarnate.
  • In the years after their Confederacy lost a civil war, to Republican President Abraham Lincoln (The Great Emancipator), Democrats established:
    • The KKK, in two distinct waves
    • Jim Crow Laws
    • Poll taxes
    • Literacy tests
    • Segregation
    • Separate but equal
    • Bull Conner, guard dogs and fire hoses
    • Planned Parenthood, the racist eugenics purveyor.
    • Grand Kleagle” Sen Robert Byrd (D)

The full list is so long, it takes volumes to capture all of the Democrat Partys racist acts. Given the tenuous links to racism cited for so many Democrat #cancelculture cries, the Democrat Party stands alone, as The Mother of All Racist Institutions, and its cancel should be a no-brainer.

Americans need no lecture, or further radical violence from Democrats, who should immediately take a knee like Nancy Pelosi, apologize to America, and rip their party out by its racist historical roots!

The Democrat Party’s Win-Win COVID-19 Strategy

Sadly, while Americans lose their lives to COVID-19, Democrats are disgracefully playing politics with the pandemic.  What makes matters even worse is that this is an election year and the American people will go to the polls in November to elect our next president. Instead of coming together and fighting for the American people, the bulk of the Democrat party is engaged in partisan politics led by Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and the Democrat Party’s minion media. Normally, I would lead with the presumptive Democrat Party presidential nominee, but Joe Biden can’t function, let alone lead, beyond creating embarrassing videos shot from his basement bunker.

Democrat Party radicals have long professed that they should never let a good crisis go to waste, echoing Marxist dogma. Unfortunately, COVID-19 is no exception. They are posturing themselves for a November win-win strategy to defeat Donald Trump, keep the House and win back the Senate.

The first part of the strategy applies if there are high mortality rates and significant American COVID-19 deaths. The Democrat strategy will be to attack President Trump and Republicans for failing to protect the American people. We’ve seen this line of Democrat/Media attack for several weeks, centered on “the President was slow to act and Americans died” mantra. It’s a totally vapid charge, but so was Trump/Russia, and the sham-peachment.

The second line of attack in their win-win scenario, kicks in if death rates are low. In this case the Democrat Party will attack Donald Trump and Republicans for hyping the coronavirus, whipping the American people into a frenzy in fear, destroying the US economy by locking down people in their homes via an authoritarian power grab. I know what you are thinking, that this isn’t possible given the “slow to act” charges being leveled today. Make no mistake, Democrats have no shame, and their Minion Media totally cover for them up. They are more than capable of turning on a dime, knowing the a lying media has their backs.

We’ve already heard some Democrat pundits crying with fear that Donald Trump’s dream is to become a dictator and the COVID-19 is his opportunity.

Both of these scenarios come with the added bonus that should Donald Trump overcome their vicious partisan attacks and win election for a second term that they could come back and impeach him for either mortality outcome. In fact, Democrats would scream that they have no choice, investigations are demanded, and inevitably impeachment would follow. This is a scenario that’s made ever more possible by the challenge Republicans have holding the Senate. Republicans must defend 23 seats this November while democrats only need defend 12.

It’s incumbent upon President Trump and the Republicans to lay the foundation for defeating each of these strategies.

They shouldn’t have to, but the reality is that Democrats are so blindly hateful and partisan that these counter strategies must be formed. Let us pray for the low death scenario, and that our national response will be so spectacular that we will all look back with wonder and amazement at how few Americans were taken by COVID-19.

NOTE: Nancy Pelosi is already shifting gears to attacking President Trump for destroying the US economy.

The Seven Pillars of Socialism

The Democrat Party devolved over past decades from a predominantly pro-America party to a largely radical socialist party. Bernie Sanders, who twice nearly won the Democrat Party’s Presidential nomination, is their most well known socialist, but far from the only one. AOC leads the new cast of true believer Democrat socialists.

In light of the Democrat Party’s pro-socialist movement, it’s critical for all Americans to understand what socialism is and how to identify socialists and socialist policies.

Socialism is Government Force to Control and Change Society.”

Socialism progresses like a snake eating its tail.”

Socialism exists as a utopian dream, extolled on the virtues of an impossible society, snake oil sold by charismatic authoritarian charlatans.

  • “All-Powerful RULERS: A ruler is quick to conquer the world but slow to conquer himself…The ruler operates according to Ruler’s Law (like a king) and will neither bow to the people’s will nor obey any written law. It is government by the ruler’s fancy and whim.”
  • Society Divided into CASTES or CLASSES: There are no rulers without slaves…Under socialism, society must be divided into classes…At the bottom are the most abused and least privileged of all: the workers, the peasants, the serfs, the slaves.”
Russian Peasants During Russian Revolution
Russian Peasants During Russian Revolution
  • All Things in COMMON: Basic socialist doctrine teaches that the ownership of property is the cause of all discord and envy…Private ownership must eventually be eliminated altogether…In centuries past, this “commonality” has gone so far as having wives and children in common.”
  • All Things REGULATED: Total control requires total regulation. By issuing a regular stream of new laws and requirements, the Rulers control all economic activities and production.”
  • “Compliance is FORCED: In socialism, all human activity is restrained or compelled to action with the use of force-penalties, fines, restrictions, “catch-22″ laws, prison and a multitude of fees and taxes.”
  • Control of INFORMATION: Information is a powerful weapon for social control…A regime…perpetuates its hold on the culture by disseminating its messages through outlets it can control such as news sources, the media, entertainment outlets, textbooks and classroom discussions.”
  • No Unalienable RIGHTS: It is important for socialism’s success to eliminate any ideas about natural rights, to jeer and ridicule them out of existence. Only government sanctioned rights may exist in a socialistic world.” NOTE: What the government can give, it can take away!”
Bill of Rights
United States Bill of Rights

Marginalizing Obama

In a 22 November Washington Post opinion column David Swerdlick argued that President Barack Obama is a conservative. Of Obama’s Presidency he wrote:

“The former president was skeptical of sweeping change, bullish on markets, sanguine about the use of military force, high on individual responsibility and faithful to a set of old-school personal values. Compare that with proposals from his would-be successors: Medicare-for-all, the Green New Deal, free college, a wealth tax, universal basic income.”

“…the former president, going back at least to his 2004 Senate race, hasn’t really occupied the left side of the ideological spectrum. He wasn’t a Republican, obviously: he never professed a desire to starve the federal government, and he opposed the Iraq War, which the GOP overwhelmingly supported. But to the dismay of many on the left, and to the continuing disbelief of many on the right, Obama never dramatically departed from the approach of presidents who came before him.”

“There’s a simple reason:”, wrote Swerdlick, “Barack Obama is a conservative…”

“To be conservative, as philosopher Michael Oakeshott, a movement hero, once put it, “is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss.” The former president channeled the sentiment faithfully when he said recently that “the average American doesn’t think that we have to completely tear down the system and remake it…He believes, fundamentally, that the American model works – even if it hasn’t been allowed to work for everyone.”

Ignoring the obvious that Obama proudly championed “fundamentally transforming AmericaObama is anything BUT a conservative. He is precisely what his resume told us he was as a presidential candidate, a radical Saul Alinsky “community organizer”.

As the Blaze’s Giancarlo Sopo observed, Swerdlick isn’t the first to make the outlandish claim that Obama is a conservative, and those claims were soundly disproven in the past.

“Variations of the “Obama is a conservative” argument were made in 2008 and early in his presidency. New York Times columnist David Brooks famously claimed in 2009 that “Obama sees himself as a Burkean” and compared him to Edmund Burke, the 18th century Anglo-Irish statesman considered by many as the progenitor of modern conservatism.”

There is a key difference though between 2008’s claims of conservatism and todays. Circa 2008, the intent was to make Obama more acceptable, or at least palatable to republicans in the hopes of peeling off some of their votes, and gaining their support. Swerdlick, and I predict a growing chorus of Minion Media talking heads, makes the claim to marginalize Obama and blunt his critiques of the Democratic Presidential field.

In recent weeks, Obama’s come out of hiding and warned democrats, to avoid extremism. I would add that he’s really signaling them that it is far better to cloak their intentions as he did.

On 15 November, the AP’s Brian Slodysko wrote “Former President Barack Obama on
Friday warned the Democratic field of White House hopefuls not to veer too far to the left, a move he said would alienate many who would otherwise be open to voting for the party’s nominee next year.”

“There are a lot of persuadable voters and there are a lot of Democrats out there who just want to see things make sense. They just don’t want to see crazy stuff. They want
to see things a little more fair, they want to see things a little more just. And how we approach that I think will be important.”

The claim that Obama is a conservative is laughable, yet also insulting, from the
democrat party intelligentsia’s view. For years countless left leaning pundits labeled conservatives as racist, bigoted, homophobic, anti-Semitic and every other vile adjective that popped into their heads at the time. In the Saul Alinsky model, they were giving conservatives the “pick a target, freeze it, isolate it, and polarize it” treatment.

Is Swerdlick’s labeling of Obama as a conservative the beginning of a similar treatment to
marginalize him and thus dismiss his warmings? Or, has the Democrat Party moved so far left that from their new position on the ideological spectrum they actually see radical Obama as right of center?

 

The Democrat’s Inquisition

Clown Graphic of Shifty Schiff, Pelosi's Grand Inquisitor
Shifty Schiff - Pelosi's Grand Inquisitor

The Spanish Inquisition lasted for over 350 years, from 1478 to 1834. It involved Inquisitors trying the accused, and passing judgement over them (prosecutor, judge and jury). “Trials” involved secret witnesses testifying against the accused, who never knew those who testified against them. The accused rarely had supporting witnesses, because nobody wanted to cross the Inquisitors and find themselves in the inquisitorial crosshairs. The accused were rarely told what they were accused of, while confessions were extracted, often by torture.

Fast forward to 2019 where Congressman Adam Schiff lurks as the all powerful Grand Inquisitor of the Democrat House’s Coup Impeachment Inquisition! Like his Spanish Inquisition forebears Schiff acts in secret, determines who testifies, stops any witnesses that would disprove his manufactured charges, prevents President Trump’s lawyers from defending him, and stops Republicans from asking Schiff’s witnesses questions, interrupting Rep. Elaine Stefanik (R-NY) numerous times on Friday. The damage Schiff, Pelosi and House Democrats are heaping on an already Russia hoax damaged federal justice system is incalculable.

The American People deserve far better! Only time will tell if AG William Barr, IG Michael Horowitz and U.S. Attorney John Durham will hold accountable those deep state actors, like Inquisitor Schiff, who see themselves above the law!

Redefining Racism

Photo from 1898 Wilmington Race Riot Commission Final Report, Burning of Love and Charity Hall, Record and Printing Offices.

Today’s Democrats can’t open their mouths without calling President Trump, conservatives, and Republicans in general racists. The meme is so old and warn out that they’ve destroyed its impact. Now Democrat politicians at every level of government stretch their imaginations for new and more hard-hitting phrases. The charges are insulting to the core, but for the sake of exposing the absurdity of the charge, let’s assume that they are true.

If the President, and Republicans are racists, we are truly terrible at it. We would have to be the most incompetent racists on the planet. I will suggest a new way, the best way to improve on the outcomes that any TRUE racist would desire for their targets.

Republicans should adopt and champion the Democrat Party’s agenda!

1. True racists would attack God, Judea Christian values, and religion in general. Republicans should deny God like the Democrat Party, and that we are made in his image. By breaking this common creation, it would be easier for Republicans to raise one race above another. Republican defense of God, and that we are all His children is just incompetent racism!

2. True racists would champion increasing the minimum wage. Democrats like Elizabeth Warren call for $15/hour. Regardless of the increase, the result will be what it always is, the loss of jobs, hitting minorities the hardest. If Republicans can raise the minimum wage, we could ensure fewer minorities found employment, and get opportunities to gain experience, prove themselves, and strengthen their resumes for better, higher paying jobs later in life. Republican policies grow the economy, spur businesses to expand and hire, returning manufacturing, lowest unemployment for minorities and women in American History, empower inner cities through Opportunity Zones. That’s just incompetent racism!

3. True racists would champion enclaving minorities in inner cities. Clustering them in slums controlled by corrupt local, one party governments. Clustering minorities in atrophying neighborhoods would enable the spread of drugs, minority on minority violence and shootings and high mortality rates. Republican policies of Opportunity Zones incentives which are expected to spur $100 Billion in long-term private capital investment in 8,764 underserved American communities, reducing regulations on businesses, encouraging their movements into these communities, and calling out the impoverished nature of these democrat strong holds is just incompetent racism!

4. True racists would champion Planned Parenthood, ensuring tax payer funding so this abortion business could expand. Since most Planned Parenthood clinics are in/near minority neighborhoods, their exploitation would ensure millions of minority babies would be aborted, minimizing their numbers across the country. Republican policies of defending every unborn child, fighting for their God given right to live is just incompetent racism!

5. True racists would support the takeover of Americas education system, and instill an agenda driven curricula that denigrates Americas founding, her founders, and blames our Great Nation for the worlds problems. By blaming America, we could convince minorities that they are victims, powerless to help themselves, and that they should be content with the scraps politicians throw them. Republicans could so destroy the education system, as Democrats have, that no inner-city minority students would be able to read and write when they graduated from high school. Republican policies demanding schools get back to teaching facts, math, history etc. and away from the America hating agenda only serves to prepare minorities for strong futures, and empowers independence required for successful lives. That’s just incompetent racism!

6. True racists would support the Green New Deal. The Democrats GND will massively raise taxes on every American, eliminate fossil fuels, aircraft, cows, crash the economy and eliminate the ability for farms to mass produce food, let alone distribute it to supermarkets, and open us up for conquest by communist China. Republicans could ensure the mass starvation of minorities by adopting the Democrat Party’s GND instead of sticking to their pesky economy, job and prosperity growing policies which expand Americas clean energy production, and inoculate us from Global oil shortages. That’s just incompetent racism!

7. True racists would support open borders, allowing drugs, human traffickers, drug cartels, gangs, and vast numbers of unskilled laborers to flood the country. These scourges prey on minority communities, fill low wage jobs, and directly compete with Americans and legal immigrants. Democrats support no borders, let alone just open borders. Such Republican policies would minimize minorities abilities to influence their elected officials, as Republicans would instead coddle support from the millions they allowed into the country. Instead, Republicans fight for legal immigration, secure borders, opposing the influx of drugs, violence, and human trafficking, in efforts to make all Americans safer, including minority communities. That’s just incompetent racism!

8. True racists would consolidate governmental power into the hands of a few, all powerful agencies and people making minorities dependent upon them. Democrats constantly push socialism/Marxism as the solution to the American problem. Socialisms defining traits are that it demands: All powerful rulers, Society divided into castes or classes, All things in common, All things regulated, Compliance is forced, Control of Information, and NO unalienable rights. Source: The Naked Socialist. Each trait would enable the denigrating minorities within an All-Powerful Government. The bigger the Government the smaller the People!
True Racists would go beyond consolidating power within the hands of the Federal government, as democrats do, they would fight for a global governance centered in the UN, which would have the power to subordinate the US Congress, let alone state and local governments, as Great Britains Parliament is ignored by the European Union. Consolidation of power at this level would allow Republicans to fulfill the Marxist/Socialist objective of global world government. Republican policies extoll the virtues of Americas founding and Constitution, which limit federal power, divide it among competing interests at the federal level, and reserve all but the enumerated powers for State governments, which are closest and most answerable to the people they serve, including minorities. Under President Trump Republicans also instituted Criminal Justice Reform. That’s just incompetent racism!

9. True racists would increase taxes under the guise of promising everything Free via government programs and funding. Like Democrats, Republicans could claim that only the rich would pay more, while knowing the tens of $Trillions these programs cost will require massive taxation on every American, including minorities. As money is taken via taxes, Liberty and Freedom diminishes, along with opportunities and choices. Republicans champion lower taxes, and the smaller, less intrusive government that results, providing greater freedom for Americans to work, start or expand their businesses, hire employees and employ capitalism which provides the greatest opportunities to the greatest number of people in the world. That’s just incompetent racism!

10. True racists would attack, undermine and try to eliminate the 2nd Amendment. Democrats have a long history of going after it, and Republicans could assail the right of Americans to own firearms for self and family protection as well. Eliminating the right to bear arms would ensure minorities were defenseless and easy prey. Republicans, however, fight for the 2nd Amendment rights of all Americans. As they said in the old west, God didn’t make men equal, Smith and Wesson did! That’s just incompetent racism!

Racism is as racism does! President Trump and Republicans are either the most incompetent racists in history, or they are effectively doing everything possible to lift up all Americans, including minorities! We all know the truth! One must then ask, what does this make Democrats?

“Congressman Brooks: Bipartisan Panel of Scientists Confirms Humans Are Not Responsible For Past 20,000 Years of Global Warming”

“July 11, 2019
Press Release

Washington, DC Thursday, in a House Science, Space, and Technology Committee hearing on climate change, under questioning by Congressman Mo Brooks (AL-05), four members of a bipartisan panel of climate science experts all admitted that humans are NOT responsible for the Earth’s global warming that has occurred over the past 20,000 years (since the Earths last glacial maximum).

By way of background, during the last glacial maximum of roughly 20,000 years ago:

  • Average global temperatures were roughly 11 degrees Fahrenheit COLDER than they are today (per Zurich University of Applied Science). Stated differently, global temperatures have risen, on average, roughly 0.5 degrees Fahrenheit per century over the past 20,000 years.
  • Sea levels were roughly 410 feet LOWER 20,000 years ago than they are today (per the United States Geological Survey). Stated differently, sea levels have risen, on average, roughly two feet per century over the past 20,000 years (roughly double the global warming enthusiasts claimed average sea level rise rate of one foot per century since 1993).
  • Almost all of Canada, Northern Europe, and America (north of the Missouri and Ohio Rivers, east to New York City) was under glacial ice and uninhabitable.

The gist of the experts opinions is that the earth was too lightly populated by humans to make humanity responsible for the Earths global warming that began 20,000 years ago.”

Pelosi Makes Molehill Out of Illegal Immigration Mountain

Nancy Pelosi, true to democrat party form, took a mountainous problem and pretended it was nothing but an insignificant mole hill. On 2 Jan, the day she became Speaker of the House for the second time, Pelosi disgracefully refused to hear about the terrible situation on our Nations southern border.

DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielson tried to brief border security statistics during a White House meeting, but was interrupted and rebuffed by Pelosi. Nielson was presenting that U.S. officials apprehended 3000 people with terrorist ties and 17,000 criminals trying to sneak across Americans southern border.

Pelosi challenged Nielson’s numbers, as if they were made up, stating that she rejected Nielsons facts.

The DHS Secretary retorted that they were not “her facts”, just “the facts!”

The exchange is the latest glaring example of democrats ignoring massive, mountain sized problems. I blogged about it several years ago and labeled the strategyMaking Mountains Out of Mole Hills and Mole Hills Out of Mountains. U.S. Officials seized 332 pounds of fentanyl being smuggled across the border in 2018 alone. That is enough to kill over 52 million full grown men. If securing America’s southern border isn’t a crisis, on that basis alone, then what is?

The answer from democrats will be another mole hill blown into earth shattering proportions no doubt! Perhaps the world ending video clip of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez dancing?